Smith v. Disposall, Inc.
| 1:2008cv00383 |
| July 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT in favor of Disposall, Inc. against Felicia Smith. All plaintiff's claims against the defendant are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs are to be taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 03/30/2010. (mab)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the opinion of this court, and DENYING the Defendant's 17 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, MOTION for Transfer of Venue by Disposall, Inc. Answer due from Disposall, Inc. on or before 8/3/2009. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 07/20/2009. (mab)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, recommending that the 17 Corrected MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Disposall, Inc. be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 05/18/2009. (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Disposall, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
