Wiley v. Treadwell Honda et al
| Labarron Wiley |
| Treadwell Honda and Benjamin Jackson |
| 1:2008cv00440 |
| July 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration and Incorporated Brief filed by Benjamin Jackson, Treadwell Honda. The Court recommends that the agreed motion to dismiss plainti ff's complaint without prejudice as to Treadwell Honda pending arbitration proceedings be granted; however plaintiff's Title VII claim against Benjamin Jackson is due to be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/5/09. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration and Incorporated Brief filed by Benjamin Jackson, Treadwell Honda. The Court recommends that the agreed motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint without prejudice as to Treadwell Honda pending arbitration proceedings be granted; however plaintiff's Title VII claim against Benjamin Jackson is due to be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 3/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/17/09. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
