Hill v. Weaver et al
Bruce Lamar Hill |
Anthony Weaver, Capt. Craft, Capt. Bishop, Sgt. Banks, COI Moody and Kathy Hammack |
1:2008cv00448 |
July 31, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Prison Condition Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
W. B. Hand |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Capt. Craft, Sgt. Banks, Capt. Bishop, Anthony Weaver be granted and that Plaintiff's action against these Defendants be dismissed with prejudic e; recommending 16 MOTION for Rule 26(f) meeting filed by Bruce Lamar Hill be denied as moot; recommending 17 MOTION to Compel filed by Bruce Lamar Hill be denied as moot Objections to R&R due by 3/11/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/18/2010. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/16/2010. (cmj) |
Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Capt. Craft, Sgt. Banks, Capt. Bishop, Anthony Weaver be granted and that Plaintiff's action against these Defendants be dismissed with prejudice; recommending 16 MOTION for Rule 26(f) meeting filed by Bruce Lamar Hill be denied as moot; recommending 17 MOTION to Compel filed by Bruce Lamar Hill be denied as moot Objections to R&R due by 3/11/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/18/2010. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.