Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Ghavamian
Plaintiff: Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Defendant: Mahin Ghavamian
Case Number: 1:2008cv00452
Filed: August 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Negotiable Instrument Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING Plf's 12 Motion to Strike Jury Demand as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/30/08. (copy mailed to Dft on 12/31/08) (tot) Modified on 12/31/2008 (tot).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Ghavamian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Jason Dwight Woodard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mahin Ghavamian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?