Kuykendall and Associates, LLC et al v. Paulk's Moving & Storage of Mobile, Inc. et al
| Kuykendall and Associates, LLC and Frederick T. Kuykendall |
| Paulk's Moving & Storage of Mobile, Inc., Roberta Ashkin and Ashkin Law Firm |
| 1:2008cv00741 |
| December 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Baldwin |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Remand to Baldwin County, Alabama as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/9/09. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 8 Motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' moiton to compel arbitration. Plaintiff's response to defendants' motion is due on or before 2/2/09. To the extent the motion to stay (doc. 8) moves the court for additional time in which to file a response to defendants motion to compel arbitration, that motion is granted, as indicated above. However, to the extent plaintiffs move the court for an order staying this action until such time as the court issues a ruling a motion to remand not yet filed, that portion of the motion is DENIED. The court cannot base its ruling on an event that has not yet occurred. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/16/09. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
