Oliver v. Cummins
| 1:2009cv00052 |
| January 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT entered denying petitioners request for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 and DISMISSING with prejudice because the claims asserted therein are unexhausted and are now precluded from review by the Alabama courts and this Court under the doctrine of procedural default. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/19/09. (copy to petitioner) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James Oliver, recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 10/28/09. (copy mailed to petitioner) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
2
Order for petitioner to pay the filing fee or file IFP motion. ( Filing Fee or IFP motion due by 3/2/2009.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 1/29/09. (IFP and this order mailed to petitioner) (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oliver v. Cummins | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
