Banks v. Bell South Advertising and Publishing

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Southern District Banks v. Bell South Advertising and Publishing

Banks v. Bell South Advertising and Publishing

Plaintiff:	Lester Lee Banks
Defendant:	Bell South Advertising and Publishing
Case Number:	1:2009cv00062
Filed:	February 6, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Callie V. S. Granade
Presiding Judge:	Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 2, 2009	Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dfts' 11 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED in part, as to the jurisdictional issues raised therein. Plf is to file an amended complaint as set out on or before 9/16/09. The court will consider the venue issues presented in Dfts' motion thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 9/2/09. (copy mailed to Plf on 9/3/09) (tot)
August 17, 2009	Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the court allow Plf to amend his complaint w/i 14 days of the date of an order of the district court on this matter as set out & recommends that the court DENY in part Dft's 11 MOTION to Dismiss as s et out. The court will address the venue issues presented in Dft's Motion to Dismiss separately following the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 8/17/09. (copy mailed to Plf on 8/18/09) (tot)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 2, 2009

Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dfts' 11 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED in part, as to the jurisdictional issues raised therein. Plf is to file an amended complaint as set out on or before 9/16/09. The court will consider the venue issues presented in Dfts' motion thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 9/2/09. (copy mailed to Plf on 9/3/09) (tot)

August 17, 2009

Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the court allow Plf to amend his complaint w/i 14 days of the date of an order of the district court on this matter as set out & recommends that the court DENY in part Dft's 11 MOTION to Dismiss as s et out. The court will address the venue issues presented in Dft's Motion to Dismiss separately following the filing of the Second Amended Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 8/17/09. (copy mailed to Plf on 8/18/09) (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banks v. Bell South Advertising and Publishing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lester Lee Banks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bell South Advertising and Publishing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?