Paulk v. Ace Moving and Storage

Plaintiff: Sandra Carol Paulk
Defendant: Ace Moving and Storage
Case Number: 1:2009cv00078
Filed: February 17, 2009
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Mobile
Referring Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Presiding Judge: Callie V. S. Granade
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 17, 2009 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Venue to the extent it seeks to transfer this action to the USDC for the SDMS. The Clerk is directed to take such steps as are necessary to effectuate this transfer. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/17/09. (copy mailed to Plf on 6/18/09) (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paulk v. Ace Moving and Storage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Carol Paulk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ace Moving and Storage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?