Shawnee Terminal Railroad Co., Inc. v. J.E. Estes Wood Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Shawnee Terminal Railroad Co., Inc. |
Defendant: |
J.E. Estes Wood Co., Inc. and A.A. Nettles, Sr. Properties, Ltd. |
Case Number: |
1:2009cv00113 |
Filed: |
March 4, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Office: |
Torts to Land Office |
County: |
Monroe |
Presiding Judge: |
|
Presiding Judge: |
Sonja F. Bivins |
Presiding Judge: |
Kristi K. DuBose |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
Diversity |
Jury Demanded By: |
28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 4, 2011 |
Filing
159
Order entered that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the right of either party to reinstate the action within 30 days should the settlement not be consummated.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/3/2011. (cmj)
|
September 12, 2011 |
Filing
134
ORDER granting 127 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/12/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
February 25, 2011 |
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING 76 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 67 MOTION to Dismiss Count One of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed by J.E. Estes Wood Co., Inc.. It is ordered that the Defendant J.E. Estes Wood Co. Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count One (Doc. 67) is GRANTED and that Count One of the Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/25/2011. Copies to parties. (sdb)
|
December 15, 2010 |
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING 65 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 24 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Or, in the Alternative, For Jurisdictional Discovery, is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/15/2010. (cmj)
|
November 23, 2010 |
Filing
65
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 24 Motion to Dismiss. It is RECOMMENDED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Or, in the Alternative, For Jurisdictional Discovery, be DENIED, at this time. Objections to R&R due by 12/13/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 11/23/10. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
September 18, 2009 |
Filing
48
JUDGMENT entered that in accordance with the Order issued on this date, the Magistrate Judges Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is hereby ADOPTED, Defendants Motion to DISMISS (Doc. 24) is hereby GRANTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/18/09. (mca)
|
August 18, 2009 |
Filing
38
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, supplementing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION to Dismiss and 24 Motion to Dismiss, recommending this action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as set out. Objections to R&R due by 9/1/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 8/18/09. (cmj)
|
June 18, 2009 |
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 MOTION to Dismiss For Want of Jurisdiction and/or Stay Proceedings Pending Discovery on Diversity Jurisdiction filed by J.E. Estes Wood Co., Inc., Shawnee Terminal Railroad Co., Inc. and 6 MOTION to Dismiss For Want of Jurisdiction and/or Stay Proceedings Pending Discvoery on Diversity Jurisdiction filed by J.E. Estes Wood Co., Inc., A.A. Nettles, Sr. Properties, Ltd., recommending that defendants' motions to dismiss be granted. The parties' motions to file sur-reply briefs 15 are granted. Objections to R&R due by 7/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 6/18/09. (cmj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?