Odom et al v. Southeast Supply Header, LLC
| Larry A. Odom, Sr. and Judy Odom |
| Southeast Supply Header, LLC |
| 1:2009cv00147 |
| March 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| Mobile |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| William H. Steele |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
JUDGMENT in favor of Southeast Supply Header as to Count Two as set out. All other claims and causes of action brought by the parties herein are dismissedwith prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 4/29/10. Copies to parties on 4/30/10. (mpp)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 68 Motion to Amend as set out. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 1/14/2010. Copies to parties on 1/15/2010. (mpp)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 44 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The remaining causes of action for trial are the portion of plaintiffs Count One (fraud) relating to misrepresentations about restoration of the right-of-way, and defendant's Count Three (abuse of process) against Larry Odom. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 12/9/09. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 6/11/09. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
