Estate of Frank McDevitt v. City of Prichard, AL et al
Estate of Frank McDevitt |
City of Prichard, AL, Warden Bennitt, Lawrence L. Battiste, Charles Kennedy, Sgt. Walker and Marvin Whitfield |
1:2009cv00415 |
July 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
Callie V. S. Granade |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 Order entered that this matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Prichard, Alabamas Notice of Bankruptcy 29 , in which said defendant represents to the Court that it has filed a voluntary petition seeking Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection. Purs uant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, the filing of a bankruptcy petition operates as stay; thus, this litigation is STAYED with regards to Plaintiffs claims against Defendant City of Prichard, Alabama. Nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a d ismissal or disposition of this matter as to Defendant City of Prichard, Alabama. Moreover, this stay shall have no effect upon Plaintiffs claims against the remaining defendants, and this action shall proceed as to those defendants. Further, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a status report regarding Defendant City of Prichard's bankruptcy proceedings on or before January 11, 2010. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/3/09. (mca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.