Escapes!, Inc. v. Legacy Land & Developments, LLC et al
| Escapes!, Inc. |
| Legacy Land & Developments, LLC, Escapes Acquisition Co., LLC, William Kearney, Allan A. Buniak and Delores Balliett |
| 1:2009cv00515 |
| August 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
367
ORDER denying 365 Balliett's Motion for Reconsideration of District Judge Order ; denying 366 Kearney's Motion for Reconsideration of District Judge Order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/26/2012. (copies mailed as directed) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
314
Order granting 311 MOTION to Supplement and Submit Newly Discovered Evidence in Support of Motion for Entry of Damages filed by Escapes!, Inc.. Plaintiff is to file, by 8/3/2012, evidence in support of the $16,355.633.78 in damag es as a Supplement to both the 306 motion for damages and 309 motion for default judgment. Defendants are to file any Response in Opposition to the 306 and 309 Motions by 8/10/2012. Damages Hearing set for 8/16/2012 at 01:00 PM in US C ourthouse, Courtroom 5A, 113 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, AL 36602 before Judge Kristi K. DuBose. The Final Pre-Trial Conference and the parties' Joint Pretrial Document filing requirement is CANCELED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/27/2012. copies mailed certified mail as directed. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
260
JUDGMENT in favor of Escapes!, Inc. against Delores Balliett and William Kearney, granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment (223). Defendant Allan Buniak remains in this action. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/23/2011. (copy to Kearney and Balliett) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
211
ORDER granting 209 Motion to Enforce Subpoena. Non-party Baker Donelson is ORDERED to respond to the subpoenas by producing only the non-privileged documents and communications in its file related to Defendants' proposed purchase of the property at issue in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 3/22/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER denying in part and deferring in part 192 Motion for Sanctions as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 3/14/2011. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 41 MOTION to Dismiss filed by William Kearney, recommending that Defendant Kearney's Motion be denied and that this action be allowed to continue. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/5/2010. (copies mailed) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
72
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 41 MOTION to Dismiss filed by William Kearney, recommending that Defendant Kearney's Motion be denied and that this action be allowed to continue. Objections to R&R due by 3/4/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 2/17/2010. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 40 re 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Delores Balliett, stating that Defendants' Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/14/09. Copies to parties on 12/15/09.(mpp)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Delores Balliett, recommending that Defendants' Motion be denied. Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 11/30/09. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
