Quale v. Unifund CCR Partners et al
Dan J. Quale |
Unifund CCR Partners and National City Card Services |
1:2009cv00519 |
August 12, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Callie V. S. Granade |
Bert W. Milling |
Plaintiff |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER re: parties' 42 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. This case is DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 5/11/10. (copy mailed to Plf on 5/11/10) (tot) Modified on 5/11/2010 (tot). |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, granting 24 MOTION to Dismiss filed by National City Card Services, and dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's complaint against National City Bank. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 03/30/2010. (copy to pltf) (mab) |
Filing 35 JUDGMENT that Counts Two & Three of Plf's Complaint are DISMISSED w/o prejudice as to Dft Unifund CCR Partners. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 1/27/10. (copy mailed to Plf on 1/28/10) (tot) |
Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Unifund CCR Partners be granted in part and denied in part as set out, and that Counts Two and Three of Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr. on 10/21/2009. (copy to pltf) (mab) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.