Scott v. Alabama Department of Corrections

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Southern District Scott v. Alabama Department of Corrections

Scott v. Alabama Department of Corrections

Plaintiff:	Joe Henry Scott, III
Defendant:	Alabama Department of Corrections
Case Number:	1:2009cv00590
Filed:	September 9, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge:	William H. Steele
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2010	Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that plaintiff's existing claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and his motions to amend (Docs. 9 & 10) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a prel iminary injunction (Doc.11) is DENIED. Plaintiff may file a new complaint that names or properly identifies those suable entities that he claims are responsible for the injuries suffered if said complaint is filed within 60 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 2/3/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
January 6, 2010	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that plaintiff's pending claims be dismissed without prejudice and that his motions to amend (Docs. 9 & 10) be denied because they are futile. It is further recommended that an extension of time of 60 days be granted from the adoption of this recommendation for plaintiff to file a new complaint (as set out). It is recommended that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 11) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 1/6/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2010

Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that plaintiff's existing claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and his motions to amend (Docs. 9 & 10) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a prel iminary injunction (Doc.11) is DENIED. Plaintiff may file a new complaint that names or properly identifies those suable entities that he claims are responsible for the injuries suffered if said complaint is filed within 60 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge William H. Steele on 2/3/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

January 6, 2010

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that plaintiff's pending claims be dismissed without prejudice and that his motions to amend (Docs. 9 & 10) be denied because they are futile. It is further recommended that an extension of time of 60 days be granted from the adoption of this recommendation for plaintiff to file a new complaint (as set out). It is recommended that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 11) be denied. Objections to R&R due by 1/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 1/6/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Alabama Department of Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Henry Scott, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?