Franklin v. Apple, Inc. et al
| Clyde Bernard Franklin |
| Apple, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. |
| 1:2009cv00704 |
| October 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Conditional Transfer Order (MDL) from Eastern District of Louisiana requesting transfer of action. Entire case file sent to requesting District consisting of Docs. 1- 12 (eec) |
Filing 11
ORDER entered re 10 Motion for Extension of Time. The unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond filed by the defendants is GRANTED. The defendants are ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond on or before February 5, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 12/23/09. (eec)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time by AT&T Mobility, L.L.C., Apple, Inc.. (Ford, Sara) |
| Answer due from AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. on 2/5/2010; Apple, Inc. on 2/5/2010. (eec) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Apple, Inc. of Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (Ford, Sara) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting 7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, adjudged and decreed that counselor Max Coleman Marx, as a member in good standing of the Bar of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, who has complied with the rules of this Court, be and is hereby admitted pro hac vice to serve the interests of justice in the above-entitled cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 11-20-09. (Cassady, William)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Max C. Marx to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 50, Receipt number 11280000000000856281, Online Credit Card Payment.) by Clyde Bernard Franklin. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Application for Admission, # 3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Marx, Max) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER granting 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, adjudged and decreed that counselor Ronnie G. Penton, as a member in good standing of the Bar of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, who has complied with the rules of this Court, be and is hereby admitted pro hac vice to serve the interests of justice in the above-entitled cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 11/3/09. (Cassady, William)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc., AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. (eec) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment to Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady for trial. (eec) |
| Remark: Summons mailed to counsel for issuance. (eec) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Ronnie G. Penton to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 50, Receipt number 11280000000000850900, Online Credit Card Payment.) by Clyde Bernard Franklin. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Application for Admission, # 3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing) (Penton, Ronnie) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons by Clyde Bernard Franklin to AT&T Mobility, L.L.C. and Apple, Inc. (Penton, Ronnie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all defendants ( Filing fee $350 receipt number 11280000000000850736, Online Credit Card Payment), filed by Clyde Bernard Franklin. (Penton, Ronnie) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2009: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (eec). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
