Terry et al v. Smith et al
| Joseph Terry and Jonah Terry |
| Grover Smith, Bruce Shue, John T. Moore, Stephen M. Billy, J. David Jordan, Arthur Mothershed and Larry Hammonds |
| 1:2009cv00722 |
| November 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Escambia |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER (amending 130 Order), 112 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Dfts Grover Smith & Bruce Shue is GRANTED as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 8/6/2012. (tot)
|
|
Filing
85
Order granting 84 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Joseph Terry, Jonah Terry (the Court construes as a motion for additional time to respond to the report and recommendation.) Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2011. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 8/9/2011. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER LIFTING STAY. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/6/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 5/16/2011. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING 57 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 27 MOTION to Dismiss. The motion to dismiss filed by defendants' Judge J. David Jordan and District Attorney Stephen Billy is GRANTED and all claims against these defendants are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/14/10. (sdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
