Todd v. Alabama Power et al
| Hunter L. Todd |
| Alabama Power, Craig Field Industrial Authority and South Dallas Water Department |
| 1:2009cv00746 |
| November 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| William H. Steele |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER: For reasons as set out, the pleading (Doc. 22 ), construed as a motion to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal or as a motion to reopen the time to appeal, is denied. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 5/10/10. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
19
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice, prior to service of process, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 3/1/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff (tgw)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered. It is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice, prior to service of process, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Given this recommendation and the reasons set forth herein, the grant of in forma pauperis status is hereby REVOKED. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 2/2/10. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
