Regions Bank v. Stewart

Regions Bank v. Stewart

Plaintiff:	Regions Bank
Defendant:	David Stewart
Case Number:	1:2010cv00145
Filed:	March 24, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
Presiding Judge:	Bert W. Milling
Presiding Judge:	Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 10, 2011	Filing 68 CHARGING ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT DAVID STEWART entered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the financial individual interests of Defendant David Stewart in ZLM Acquisitions, LLC, Shimmering Sands Development Company, LLC, and P&P Acquisitions, LLC be ch arged with payment of the Final Judgment rendered in this action in favor of Plaintiff Regions Bank for seven hundred eighty-six thousand, one hundred eighty-four dollars and thirty-nine cents ($786,184.39), as further set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 5/10/2011. (clr)
November 8, 2010	Filing 54 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Regions Bank against David Stewart. Pursuant to separate order entered this date granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of Regions Bank and against David Stewart on all counts and in the amount of seven hundred eighty-six thousand, one hundred eighty-four dollars and thirty-nine cents ($786,184.39) as of November 8, 2010. Regions Bank is entitled to recover its taxable costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 11/8/10. (clr)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 10, 2011

Filing 68 CHARGING ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT DAVID STEWART entered, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the financial individual interests of Defendant David Stewart in ZLM Acquisitions, LLC, Shimmering Sands Development Company, LLC, and P&P Acquisitions, LLC be ch arged with payment of the Final Judgment rendered in this action in favor of Plaintiff Regions Bank for seven hundred eighty-six thousand, one hundred eighty-four dollars and thirty-nine cents ($786,184.39), as further set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 5/10/2011. (clr)

November 8, 2010

Filing 54 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Regions Bank against David Stewart. Pursuant to separate order entered this date granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor of Regions Bank and against David Stewart on all counts and in the amount of seven hundred eighty-six thousand, one hundred eighty-four dollars and thirty-nine cents ($786,184.39) as of November 8, 2010. Regions Bank is entitled to recover its taxable costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 11/8/10. (clr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regions Bank v. Stewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regions Bank
Represented By:	Allen E. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Stewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?