Kennedy v. Boles Investment, Inc. et al
J. Gregory Kennedy |
Boles Investment, Inc. and Ian Boles |
1:2010cv00475 |
August 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Baldwin |
William E. Cassady |
William H. Steele |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 ORDER denying the 9 & 31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings insofar as they seek Rule 12(c) adjudication of setoff issues. Any and all claims for setoff joined in the pleadings are dismissed without prejudice. The 51 Motion to Stay Entry of Final Judgment is denied. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/8/2011. (tgw) |
Filing 41 Order granting in part denying in part 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Ian Boles, Boles Investment, Inc.; granting in part denying in part 31 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by J. Gregory Kennedy. The 22 MOTION for L eave to File Amend Complaint is denied as futile. Both Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings remain pending insofar as they seekRule 12(c) relief on setoff issues. With regard to the pending setoff issues, the parties are ordered to file a Status R eport by 6/28/2011 concerning the progress of negotiations. Plaintiff is ordered by 7/5/2011 to file a supplemental memorandum of law identifying and addressing such issues. Defendants' supplemental response is due by 7/12/2011. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 6/7/2011. (tgw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.