GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co. v. Small et al
| GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co. |
| Stanley E. Small, The Estate of Ryan Scott Small and Frank H. Kruse |
| 1:2010cv00641 |
| November 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
Order entered that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE subject to the right of either party to reinstate the action within 30 days should the settlement not be consummated.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/2/2012. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER denying 86 Motion for Summary Judgment by GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co.; denying 100 Motion for Hearing before District Judge. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/15/12. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER re: 91 Motion for Reconsideration. The Court reconsiders the November 29, 2011 Order (doc. 90) and Defendant George's Motion to Amend (doc. 82) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/12/2011. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying 41 Motion to Strike Jury Demand, as set out in order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/11/2011. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 43 Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 4/28/2011. (sdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
