Alms v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
| Brenda H. Alms |
| Laboratory Corporation of America and Lexis Nexis Medical Review Services |
| 1:2010cv00646 |
| November 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Baldwin |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT entered that claims of Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/1/2012. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 59 Motion to Amend Complaint as set out. The Clerk is directed to correct the docket as set out.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/20/2011. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
58
Order that the Court finds "Charlene" was fraudulently joined in these proceedings and that her alleged Alabama citizenship is to be ignored for jurisdictional purposes. Alms' citizenship is diverse from Lexis Nexis' and Winn-Dixie's and the Court is satisfied that it has subject matter jurisdiction over this case and that removal from the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama was proper. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/16/2011. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
55
Order for parties to file briefs as set out. The motions deadline previously set is reset to 1/6/12. ( Brief due by 12/9/2011) (Motions deadline reset to 1/6/2012.). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/2/2011. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
