Chapman v. Western Express, Inc. et al
Kenneth Chapman |
Western Express, Inc., Total Transportation and Knight Transportation Gulfport |
1:2010cv00675 |
December 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
William H. Steele |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/25/2011. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw) |
Filing 48 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss. The Motion is granted as to plf's Title VII and ADEA claims alleging discriminatory discharge, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Motion to Dismiss is denied as to plf's Title VII and ADEA claims alleging discriminatory dissemination of false information to prospective employers, and this action will proceed as to those claims. The 11 Motion is moot insofar as it seeks dismissal of ADA and EPA claims .; denying 34 Motion to hold Hire Right - Consumer Consulting Department accountable; denying 39 Motion to Strike; denying 40 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff's assorted motions found at documents 27 , 28 , 29 , 42 , 43 and 45 are moot. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/28/11. Copies to parties. Copy of Pro Se Litigant Guide to Plf as directed. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.