Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the City of Prichard
Debtor: City of Prichard, Alabama
Movant: Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the City of Prichard
Case Number: 1:2010mc00012
Filed: April 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Mobile Office
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to file an Interlocutory Appeal as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/9/10. Copies to parties on 6/10/10. (mpp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the City of Prichard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: City of Prichard, Alabama
Represented By: Junius F. Guin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the City of Prichard
Represented By: Richard M. Gaal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?