Steele v. Patterson

Steele v. Patterson

Petitioner:	Larry Steele
Respondent:	Tony Patterson
Case Number:	1:2011cv00044
Filed:	January 27, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 30, 2011	Filing 21 JUDGMENT that this Court is procedurally barred from reaching the merits of Steele's claims raised in the instant habeas corpus petition and, alternatively, with respect to his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, that petitioner's rig hts were not violated in this cause such that his request for habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be DENIED. Steele is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/29/2011. copy mailed to petitioner. (sdb)
June 15, 2011	Filing 12 Order - Prior to ruling on the procedural default issues raised by the respondent, it is ORDERED that the petitioner answer interrogatories as further set out by 7/15/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 6/15/2011. copies mailed. (sdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 30, 2011

Filing 21 JUDGMENT that this Court is procedurally barred from reaching the merits of Steele's claims raised in the instant habeas corpus petition and, alternatively, with respect to his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, that petitioner's rig hts were not violated in this cause such that his request for habeas corpus relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be DENIED. Steele is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/29/2011. copy mailed to petitioner. (sdb)

June 15, 2011

Filing 12 Order - Prior to ruling on the procedural default issues raised by the respondent, it is ORDERED that the petitioner answer interrogatories as further set out by 7/15/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 6/15/2011. copies mailed. (sdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steele v. Patterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry Steele
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tony Patterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?