Judd v. State of Alabama
Plaintiff: Keith Russell Judd
Defendant: State of Alabama
Case Number: 1:2011cv00282
Filed: June 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Mobile Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge: Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Keith Russell Judd, dismissing this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g). The Motion IFP (doc. 2) is denied. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/13/2011. (copy mailed) (cmj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Judd v. State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Russell Judd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?