Norman v. Ryla Teleservices, Inc.

Norman v. Ryla Teleservices, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Melissa Norman
Defendant:	Ryla Teleservices, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2011cv00433
Filed:	August 1, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge:	William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 7, 2012	Filing 48 ORDER entered that it is ORDERED that the parties motion for approval of Plaintiffs Acceptance of Defendants Rule 68 Offer of Judgment as amended (Docs. 36, 37, 39, 42, 45) to include an acceptance of a Rule 68 judgment, is GRANTED. Therefore , the settlement is APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over Fair Labor Standards Act provisions, and Plaintiff Melissa Norman is due $150.00 as straight time wages, $551.25 as overtime wages and $551 .25 as liquidated damages, for a total of $1,252.50. Additionally, upon consideration and for the reasons set forth herein, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Docs. 40, 41) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as fol lows: Plaintiffs counsel is due to be paid the sum of $14,420.00 as a reasonable attorneys fee plus costs of $768.65. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE per the Rule 68 Offer and Acceptance of Judgment. A Final Judgment shall issue contemporaneously with this Order by separate document. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/7/2012. (mca)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 7, 2012

Filing 48 ORDER entered that it is ORDERED that the parties motion for approval of Plaintiffs Acceptance of Defendants Rule 68 Offer of Judgment as amended (Docs. 36, 37, 39, 42, 45) to include an acceptance of a Rule 68 judgment, is GRANTED. Therefore , the settlement is APPROVED as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over Fair Labor Standards Act provisions, and Plaintiff Melissa Norman is due $150.00 as straight time wages, $551.25 as overtime wages and $551 .25 as liquidated damages, for a total of $1,252.50. Additionally, upon consideration and for the reasons set forth herein, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees (Docs. 40, 41) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as fol lows: Plaintiffs counsel is due to be paid the sum of $14,420.00 as a reasonable attorneys fee plus costs of $768.65. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE per the Rule 68 Offer and Acceptance of Judgment. A Final Judgment shall issue contemporaneously with this Order by separate document. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/7/2012. (mca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norman v. Ryla Teleservices, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Norman
Represented By:	Banks C. Ladd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ryla Teleservices, Inc.
Represented By:	Malvern U. Griffin, III
Represented By:	Allegra J. Lawrence-Hardy
Represented By:	Jessica S. Wang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?