Lee v. The Krystal Company et al
| Reena Lee |
| The Krystal Company, Brian Broome and Vernon J. McLemore |
| 1:2011cv00627 |
| November 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| William H. Steele |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER finding as moot 46 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 53 Motion for Default Judgment. The Crossclaim is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Clerks Office is directed to close this file for administrative and statisticalpurposes. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/4/2013. (mbp)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bryan Broome & Vernon McLemore. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/23/2013. Copy mailed to Bryan Broome. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is awarded reasonable attorney's fees in the total amount of $22,577.50, and costs in the amount of $615.87. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/15/2013. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
33
Order re: 32 Acceptance of Defendant's Offer of Judgment & Motion for Approval and Acceptance of Same filed by Reena Lee. Lee is ordered by 9/18/2012 to submit her attorney's fee petition as set out. Krystal's Response is due by 10/2/2012, Replies due by 10/9/2012. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/28/2012. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
