Osborne v. Patterson et al
||Kim T. Thomas, Dexter Brown, J. Peavy, Michael Watson, Brian Davis and Tony Patterson
||November 14, 2011
||Alabama Southern District Court
||Kristi K. DuBose
||Katherine P. Nelson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 26, 2013
JUDGMENT in favor of Benjamin Davis, Brian Davis, Dexter Brown, J. Peavy, Michael Watson against Korrin Osborne. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/25/2013. (copy to Osborne) (cmj)
|March 27, 2013
ORDER entered that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated February 22, 2013 (doc. 36) is ADOPTED, in part, as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and R ecommendation, it is ORDERED that defendants Kim Thomas and Tony Pattersons motion for summary judgment (doc. 30) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that defendants motion for summary judgment as to defendants Dexter Brown, Michael Watson, Brian Davis , and Jonathan Peavy is DENIED AT THIS TIME. It is ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing will be held on June 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in the Wardens Conference Room at Holman Correctional Facility, Atmore, Alabama. The Alabama Department of Correction is ORDERED to either produce Osborne in person for the hearing or provide his appearance via video-conference. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Anne Hill, General Counsel for the Alabama Department of Corrections. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/27/2013. (mca)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?