Sears v. Williams et al
| Maurice Lamont Sears |
| Anthony Williams, Corr. Officer Kenkel, Corr. Officer Redhorn, Capt. Hetrick, Kim Thomas and C. S. White |
| 1:2011cv00719 |
| December 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
Order denying with prejudice 43 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default filed by Maurice Lamont Sears. Answer due from Anthony Williams on 7/31/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 7/11/2014. copy of order mailed to plf. Copy of order mailed to dft by regular mail and via certified mail, as directed. (sdb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2014: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (sdb).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 Complaint filed by Maurice Lamont Sears. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants White, Meyer, Hetrick, Mosley, Thomas, Bentley, and Personnel Department are dismissed from this action wi th prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as the claims against them are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/25/2013. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
