GOS Operator, LLC v. Sebelius et al
GOS Operator, LLC |
Marilyn Tavenner, R. Bob Mullins, Jr. and Kathleen Sebelius |
1:2012cv00035 |
January 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Katherine P. Nelson |
William H. Steele |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit for Reply Brief, denying 25 Motion to Dismiss; and denying 4 construed Motion for Preliminary Injunction as further set out. The TRO 13 entered 1/20/12 is dissolved. Defendant's answers to the complaint are due on or before 2/24/2012. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/10/12. (jlr) |
Filing 13 Order granting 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by GOS Operator, LLC. Plaintiff is ordered by 1/23/2012 to file redacted exhibits as set out. Defendants are temporarily enjoined and restrained from terminating Gordon Oaks' Medic are and Medicaid provider agreements, pending a pre-termination administrative hearing. Any defendant wishing to be heard on plaintiff's request to convert the Temporary Restraining Order into a Preliminary Injunction must file a brief by 1/27/ 2012, Plaintiff's reply due by 1/31/2012. This Order shall expire at the close of business on 2/3/2012, unless extended. Plaintiff is ordered to serve copies of this Order on defendants. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/20/2012. (tgw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.