Tull Brothers, Inc. v. Peerless Products, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Southern District Tull Brothers, Inc. v. Peerless Products, Inc.

Tull Brothers, Inc. v. Peerless Products, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Tull Brothers, Inc.
Defendant:	Peerless Products, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv00314
Filed:	May 14, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Kristi K. DuBose
Presiding Judge:	Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2013	Filing 101 ORDER re: 68 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 75 Motion to Strike ; 80 Motion to Strike. Defendants Motion for SummaryJudgment (Doc. 68) is: DENIED as to Tull Brothers negligence claim; GRANTED as to TullBrothers express warranty claim ; GRANTED as to Tull Brothers indemnity claim; and TullBrothers breach of contract claim is CARRIED TO TRIAL. Additionally, it is ORDEREDthat Peerless Motion to Strike (Docs. 80-81) as to Fred Tull is OVERRULED, as to Paul Beersis MOOT; and as to design defects is OVERRULED; and Tull Brothers Motion to Strike as toCoby Jones (Docs. 75-76) is MOOT.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/18/2013. (cmj)
November 29, 2012	Filing 43 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Leave to File amended answer. Peerless shall file its amended answer, as set out, on or before 12/10/12. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/28/2012. (cmj)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2013

Filing 101 ORDER re: 68 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 75 Motion to Strike ; 80 Motion to Strike. Defendants Motion for SummaryJudgment (Doc. 68) is: DENIED as to Tull Brothers negligence claim; GRANTED as to TullBrothers express warranty claim ; GRANTED as to Tull Brothers indemnity claim; and TullBrothers breach of contract claim is CARRIED TO TRIAL. Additionally, it is ORDEREDthat Peerless Motion to Strike (Docs. 80-81) as to Fred Tull is OVERRULED, as to Paul Beersis MOOT; and as to design defects is OVERRULED; and Tull Brothers Motion to Strike as toCoby Jones (Docs. 75-76) is MOOT.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/18/2013. (cmj)

November 29, 2012

Filing 43 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Leave to File amended answer. Peerless shall file its amended answer, as set out, on or before 12/10/12. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 11/28/2012. (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tull Brothers, Inc. v. Peerless Products, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tull Brothers, Inc.
Represented By:	Mark D. Herbert
Represented By:	Michael Jason Clayton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Peerless Products, Inc.
Represented By:	William C. Roedder, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?