McCoy v. Hetzel

Petitioner: Lamar McCoy
Respondent: Warden Hetzel
Case Number: 1:2012cv00326
Filed: May 17, 2012
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Monroe
Referring Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Presiding Judge: Callie V. S. Granade
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2014 33 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT that McCoy's petition for habeas corpus is DISMISSED w/prejudice as time-barred, & that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Respondent Warden Hetzel & against Petitioner Lamar McCoy. Any motion for a Certificate of Appealability or for permission to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 3/18/2014. (copy mailed to Pet on 3/18/14) (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Hetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Hetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lamar McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?