Jacoby v. Mack et al
| Brent Jacoby |
| Baldwin County, Huey Mack, Dale Byrne, Mr. Carr, Mr. Kearse, Mr. Boyington, Mr. Rowell and Sgt. Scott |
| 1:2012cv00366 |
| May 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| Callie V. S. Granade |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts Officers Joshua Keers & John Rowell against Plf Brent Jacoby. All claims against Dfts are DISMISSED w/prejudice as set out. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/12/2017. (tot)
|
|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff Brent Jacoby recovery nothing and the claims made against Defendants Sheriff Huey Mack, Major Dale Byrne, Major Milton, Corporal Kent Carr, Officer Joshua Keers, Officer Mark Boyington, and Officer John Rowell are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 5/30/2014. (copy to pltf) (mab)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as the opinion of this Court, and dismissing defendants Baldwin County and Sergeant Scott with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28:1915(e)(2)(B)(i) because the claims against each are frivolous. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/28/2012. (copy to pltf) (mab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
