Caffey v. Mobile Police Department et al
Plaintiff:
Sonja Caffey
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department and Chris Wilkerson
Case Number:
1:2012cv00400
Filed:
June 15, 2012
Court:
Alabama Southern District Court
Office:
Mobile Office
County:
Mobile
Presiding Judge:
William H. Steele
Referring Judge:
Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit:
Prison Condition
Cause of Action:
42:1983
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| October 4, 2013 | 40 |
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment be entered in favor of the Defendant Chris Wilkerson and against Plaintiff Sonja Caffey. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/4/2013. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
| August 12, 2013 | 36 |
ORDER granting 24 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mobile Police Department. This dismissal with without prejudice to the plaintiff's ability to seek leave to amend her complaint to name a suable entity. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 8/12/2013. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
| November 5, 2012 | 16 |
ORDER: The Court declines to accept the 7 Report and Recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Court concludes that the complaint should be served on the defendants and that the Magistrate Judge should oversee this process. The 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel is denied. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/5/2012. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
