Key v. Mott et al
| Jonie Key |
| The Town of Mount Vernon, Jerry C. Lundy, Steve A. Reed, Joe Cassidy, Jerry K. Taylor, Johnnie Robinson, Cecil Earl Driskill, Robert Taylor, Jr., Jeffery Bolden, Jr., Verdell Trotter-Dees and James Mott |
| 1:2012cv00614 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
ORDER ADOPTING 125 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS REVISED re 116 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint filed by Steve A. Reed, Joe Cassidy, Jerry K. Taylor, Jerry C. Lundy. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. 116) is GRANTED and the claims against them are dismissed as set out in order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/5/2015. (cmj)
|
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 31 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Steve A. Reed, Jeffery Bolden, Jr., Verdell Trotter-Dees, Cecil Earl Driskill, Robert Taylor, Jr., Joe Cassidy, Jerry K . Taylor, Johnnie Robinson, Jerry C. Lundy and 29 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by The Town of Mount Vernon, modifying the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as set out in order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/29/2013. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.