Cloy v. Bouckuey et al
| Rickie Lee Cloy |
| Jody W. Campbell, Huey Hoss Mack, Tracy Bouckuey and Helen Hill |
| 1:2012cv00718 |
| November 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Huey Hoss Mack. Macks motion for summary judgment (Docs. 40, 41, 46) is GRANTED and all claims against him are DISMISSED with prejudice; Cloy's claims a gainst Seymore and Boutwell are DISMISSED with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(iii), as they are immune from damages in this action. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/15/2015. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
18
Order denying 12 MOTION to summons special master filed by Rickie Lee Cloy. Denying 17 MOTION to Stay filed by Rickie Lee Cloy. It is ORDERED that plaintiff now file, by 5/20/2013, a second amended complaint on this Court's § 1983 complaint form that corrects the pleading deficiencies noted in the Court's 16 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 3/21/2013. copy of order and form mailed to plf. (sdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
