Bullard v. Dolgen Corp., Inc.

Plaintiff: Cynthia Bullard
Defendant: Dolgen Corp., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00028
Filed: January 22, 2013
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 26, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court Order that the agreements re: ESI in the 12 Supplement to Rule 26(f) Report are hereby incorporated into the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order entered on April 11, 2013 (Doc. 10 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 4/26/2013. (sdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bullard v. Dolgen Corp., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dolgen Corp., Inc.
Represented By: Edward F. Harold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Bullard
Represented By: Sherrie V. McKenzie
Represented By: H. Wallace Blizzard
Represented By: C. Michael Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?