Evans v. Ankor Energy LLC et al
Roy Evans, Jr. |
Ankor Energy LLC, EOG Resources, Inc., Offshore Contract Services, Northstar Offshore Group LLC, Albert P. Hebert and Wood Group Production Services, Inc. |
Offshore Contract Services |
Wood Group Production Services, Inc. |
1:2013cv00182 |
April 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
Sonja F. Bivins |
Callie V. S. Granade |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts Ankor Energy LLC, Offshore Contract Services, Albert P. Hebert as to Plf's breach of contract claims (Counts III & IV) & against Plf Roy Evans, Jr. Accordingly, Counts III & IV of Plf's Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED w/prejudice. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 7/21/2014. (tot) |
Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING in part & DENYING in part Dfts' 72 Motion for Summary Judgment as set out. Dfts' Motion is GRANTED IN PART as to the breach of contract claims (Counts III & IV) & DENIED IN PART as to the tort claims (Counts I & II) as set out. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 3/28/2014. (tot) |
Filing 32 ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft Wood Group Production Services, Inc.'s MOTION to Dismiss (Doc. 1-1 @ 71) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 6/3/2013. (tot) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.