Givens v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
| Margaret Taylor Givens |
| Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv00245 |
| May 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Katherine P. Nelson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER, DENYING Defendant Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.'s 72 Motion to Reconsider Order Regarding Saxon's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/20/2014. (mab)
|
|
Filing
69
Order setting this action for MEDIATION on 6/20/2014 at 10:00 AM in US Courthouse, Judge's Chambers (Room 459), 113 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, AL 36602 before Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine P. Nelson on 6/13/2014. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Saxon's 48 Motion for Summary Judgment - denied as to Counts One and Two of the Amended Complaint only to the extent Givens claims she was fraudulently induced to enter into the HAMP modification process, is denied as to Count Six of the Amended Complaint, and is otherwise granted; granting RCS's 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/30/14. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
