Lee v. Monroe County Heritage Museum, Inc.

Plaintiff: Nelle Harper Lee
Defendant: Monroe County Heritage Museum, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00490
Filed: October 10, 2013
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Monroe
Referring Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 7, 2014 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 2/7/2014. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Monroe County Heritage Museum, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monroe County Heritage Museum, Inc.
Represented By: Sam David Knight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nelle Harper Lee
Represented By: Robert Clardia(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Craig Justin Albert(Designation Retained)
Represented By: A. Clay Rankin, III
Represented By: Norman Matt Stockman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?