Fratelli Cosulich Unipessoal, S.A. v. Specialty Fuels Bunkering, LLC et al
Fratelli Cosulich Unipessoal, S.A. |
Specialty Fuels Bunkering, LLC and Specialty Fuels BTU, LLC |
1:2013cv00545 |
November 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
Mobile Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER ADOPTING 76 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 65 MOTION to Dismiss Counts Three, Four, Five, Six, Eight, Nine, Ten, and Eleven of the Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim filed by Bunkers International Corporatio n, AND 67 MOTION to Dismiss and Strike filed by Specialty Fuels BTU, LLC, F. Javier Brito. Defendant Bunkers International Corp's motion to dismiss (doc. 65 ) is DENIED. Defendant BTU and Brito's motion to dismiss (doc. 67 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: granted with respect to Plaintiff's fraud in insolvency claim (Count VII), which is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim and denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/1/2015. (cmj) |
Filing 30 Order granting 27 Second MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Fratelli Cosulich Unipessoal, S.A.. Cosulich shall file its proposed second amended complaint (Docs. 27-1 - 27-3) as the operative complaint in this action by 6/13/2014. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/11/2014. copies to parties. (sdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.