Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Anita Nguyen, LLC et al
| Ramada Worldwide Inc. |
| Anita Nguyen, LLC and Hong V. Nguyen |
| 1:2013mc00003 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
Order re: 11 MOTION renew judgment, as supplemented with the 16 Affidavit filed by Poser Investments Inc. It is ORDERED that Poser's Motion to Renew the Judgment (Doc. 11), as supplemented (Doc. 16), is GRANTED such that the December 3, 2012 Judgment (Doc. 1-1) is hereby REVIVED through December 3, 2032. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 05/22/2023. (nah)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER re: 14 Order on Motion to Renew Judgment. The Court finds that it is insufficient to rebut the presumption of satisfaction of judgment as required under Alabama law for renewal of a judgment. The Order is VACATED and Poser is given leave to file another affidavit or declaration on or before 05/01/2023. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 04/19/2023. (cjr)
|
|
Filing
14
Order GRANTING 11 MOTION renew judgment filed by Poser Investments Inc. The December 3, 2012 Judgment issued in this case (Doc. [1-1]) is hereby REVIVED through December 3, 2032, as set out. Signed by District Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 4/11/2023. (meh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
