Perry v. Department of Corrections

Petitioner: Carl A. Perry, Jr.
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Case Number: 1:2014cv00044
Filed: February 4, 2014
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Escambia
Referring Judge: Sonja F. Bivins
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 30, 2014 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Carl A. Perry, Jr. The petition is dismissed with prejudice as successive and judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent, Gary Hetzel and against he Petitioner, Cal Perry and if any motion for certificate of appealability or for permission to appeal IFP it is denied. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/30/2014. (copy mailed) (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Hetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Carl A. Perry, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?