Spain et al v. RJM Acquisitions LLC

Spain et al v. RJM Acquisitions LLC

Plaintiff:	Pamela Spain
Defendant:	RJM Acquisitions LLC
Case Number:	1:2014cv00326
Filed:	July 14, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office:	Mobile Office
County:	Mobile
Presiding Judge:	Callie V. S. Granade
Presiding Judge:	Katherine P. Nelson
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2015	Filing 44 ORDER re: 43 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the individual claims of Spain & without prejudice to the claims of the unknown putative class members. Each party shall bear her/its own costs. Dft's 36 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is deemed to be MOOT. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/1/2015. (tot)
September 3, 2014	Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING parties' 8 Joint Motion to Stay. This action is STAYED pending the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision on the application for rehearing pending in Crawford. The parties are to notify the Court within seven days of a ruling on the application of rehearing. If denied, the stay will be lifted, & the dft will be required to file its responsive pleading within 14 days of the date the stay is lifted, & a preliminary scheduling order will be entered. If granted, the parties will be required to file a status report every 90 days thereafter until the Eleventh Circuit issues its final decision in the Crawford case. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 9/3/2014. (tot)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2015

Filing 44 ORDER re: 43 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to the individual claims of Spain & without prejudice to the claims of the unknown putative class members. Each party shall bear her/its own costs. Dft's 36 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is deemed to be MOOT. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/1/2015. (tot)

September 3, 2014

Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING parties' 8 Joint Motion to Stay. This action is STAYED pending the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision on the application for rehearing pending in Crawford. The parties are to notify the Court within seven days of a ruling on the application of rehearing. If denied, the stay will be lifted, & the dft will be required to file its responsive pleading within 14 days of the date the stay is lifted, & a preliminary scheduling order will be entered. If granted, the parties will be required to file a status report every 90 days thereafter until the Eleventh Circuit issues its final decision in the Crawford case. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 9/3/2014. (tot)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spain et al v. RJM Acquisitions LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Spain
Represented By:	Earl P. Underwood, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RJM Acquisitions LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?