Wilson v. Whittle et al
| Zachery Wilson |
| Emily Whittle, Sgt. Franklin and Brian Ezell |
| 1:2014cv00337 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Charles R. Butler |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that Defendants Whittle, Franklin and Ezell are entitled to summary judgment in their favor on all claims asserted against them by Plaintiff, and that this action against these Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 5/18/2015. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Zachery Wilson's claims for Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement against Defendant Whittle, and his claims for supervisory liability and due process violations as alleged against Defendants Meyers, Howard and Fails be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The remaining of Plaintiff's claims for excessive force and medical care claims shall be allowed to proceed with service. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 11/13/2014. copies to parties. (sdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
