McCorvey v. Weaver et al
| Simp McCorvey |
| Leston Stallworth, Jack B. Weaver and Roderick McCorvey, III |
| 1:2014cv00377 |
| August 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| William H. Steele |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss; granting 18 Motion to Dismiss. plaintiff's claims against both Roderick McCorvey and Leston Stallworth aredismissed with prejudice. Because this Order disposes of all remaining claims and issues joined in this action, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this file. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 1/12/2015. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Jury Trial. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/18/2014. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 11/14/2014. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
|
Filing
11
Order granting 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jack B. Weaver. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Weaver are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate Judge Jack B. Weaver as a party defendant to this litigation. This action will proceed as to defendants Leston Stallworth andRoderick McCorvey. Signed by Chief Judge William H. Steele on 10/21/2014. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (tgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
