Moore v. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan et al

Plaintiff: James Moore
Defendant: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan, Plan Administrative Committeee of the Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan, Continental Motors Pension PLan, Allegheny Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan and Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2014cv00463
Filed: October 3, 2014
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2015 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 72 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 69 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Plan Administrative Committeee of the Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan is granted. Plaintiffs claims against those Defendants are dismissed without prejudice so that the Plaintiff may refile his claims after exhausting his administrative remedies.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/30/2015. (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Moore
Represented By: Glen M. Connor(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Richard P. Rouco(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan
Represented By: Grace Robinson Murphy
Represented By: William B. Wahlheim, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plan Administrative Committeee of the Teledyne Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan
Represented By: Grace Robinson Murphy
Represented By: William B. Wahlheim, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Continental Motors Pension PLan
Represented By: Bricker Scott Daughtry(Designation Retained)
Represented By: James Crawford Miller(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Jeremy Patrick Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allegheny Technologies Incorporated Pension Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?