Robinson v. Estes

Petitioner: Steven Robinson
Respondent: Dewayne Estes
Case Number: 1:2015cv00199
Filed: April 14, 2015
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Katherine P. Nelson
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 6, 2017 21 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Petitioner Steven Robinson's petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 12) this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability, or to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by District Judge William H. Steele on 3/6/2017. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (tgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dewayne Estes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?