Thomas v. Demmings, et al
| Britney R. Thomas |
| Lt. Demmings, Sgt. Hayes, Ofc. Clark, Det. Golston 15042 and Ofc. Hill |
| 1:2015cv00291 |
| June 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| Charles R. Butler |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Britney R. Thomas, incorporating by reference doc. 29. Pursuant to Rule 56(f)(3) of FRCP summary judgment be entered in favor of defendant Officer Hill and Plaintiff Thomas' complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 12/1/2016. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 27 MOTION to Subpoena Surveillance video, 11 MOTION to amend complaint filed by Britney R. Thomas, and 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lt. Demmings, Det. Golston 15042, Sgt . Hayes, Ofc. Clark. It is ordered that the motion to subpoena surveillance video is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is denied and Defts' motion summary judgment is GRANTED and these Defts are DISMISSED with prejudice, as further set out.. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 6/15/2016. (copy to plaintiff) (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
