Lynam et al v. Alabama Department of Post Secondary Education
| John Lynam and Bishop State Community College |
| Alabama Department of Post-Secondary Education |
| 1:2015cv00378 |
| July 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William E. Cassady |
| Callie V. S. Granade |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER, Dfts' 66 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED in part as set out, & Dfts' 68 Motion to Retax Costs is GRANTED as set out. Dfts are entitled to an award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $44,891.50 & costs in the amount of $1,660.80, for a total award of $46,552.30 as set out. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 4/5/2017. (tot)
|
|
Filing
64
JUDGMENT in favor of Dfts Alabama Community College System, Bishop State Community College against Plf John Lynam, & this case is DISMISSED W/PREJUDICE. Costs are taxed against Plf. Signed by Senior Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 11/4/2016. (tot)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Bishop State Community College & Alabama Department of Post-Secondary Education is GRANTED, & Count I of Plf's complaint & the punitive damages demand in Count II of the complaint are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 12/1/2015. (tot)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
